November 13, 2012
Snap Judgments
This episode of the series, “Genius
of Photography,” focused on the evolution of the value of photographic work and
photography’s place in the art world. Aside from its uses and the motivations
behind the works, one aspect in determining the value of a photographic image
or print was its reproducibility. It’s an interesting consideration—is a print
unique enough to garner high demand and thus be assigned a greater value? This
question adds great controversy to the discussion, “Is photography art?” And
there may not be any one answer. If there is one thing to be taken away from a
course in photography and the history of the process, it is that photography is
many things in one. One must consider the number of print editions, the date
printed, the subject of the image, even the photographer him or herself, and
more, in order to determine the value of an image. I feel that even so, in the
present day, the value of any one image weighs heavily on a great deal of
variables.
November 15, 2012
We Are Family
In this episode of the series, one
observed more closely the photographer’s fascination with the
familiar—including, in some cases, the familial. Diane Arbus thought that
photographs revealed what you couldn’t help people knowing about you. In her
images, she (as well as the other
artists mentioned) sought to show what people failed to see. Photography
was—and is—a portal through which one might take the time to actually see with
one’s eyes, as one should normally. It had/has the ability to highlight that
which is in plain sight yet often overlooked. For Duane Michals, this was the
delusion of portraiture. The discussion of the reality of intimacy was opened,
for one had to realize that what appears concrete in a photograph could be an
illusion. And as such, the thought shifts from truth in physical appearance to
the opposite—untruth in photographic evidence. Again, this highlights the
fluidity of the photographic medium.
November 20, 2012
Right Time, Right
Place
This episode focused on war
photographers’ works produced during World War II, during which photography was
heavily utilized for the first time to document history during the event and
afterwards, and reproduced for the public’s viewing. At the time, smaller,
portable cameras were gaining popularity in use with photographers. This allowed
them to capture images much more quickly than earlier formats had been able to.
The reach of photography was going beyond studio portraits and nature
photography. One could now capture images on a handheld device that required
little else in terms of heavy equipment or long exposure times. At that point,
the majority of human history has been documented in photographic images. Images
came out of the battlefields of World War II and the aftermath of the nuclear
devastation in Nagasaki. People could see first hand the effects of war; all
romantic notions about war were then relinquished. Photography singlehandedly
could change the public’s view on a subject or event, as no other medium could
before.
No comments:
Post a Comment